Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis Expert

@assignsolver

Systematic reviews with meta-analysis demand rigorous protocol adherence and statistical precision—most fail at the screening phase or mishandle effect size calculations across heterogeneous RCTs. This project aligns directly with 15+ years of research methodology experience. The workflow covers protocol registration, comprehensive database searches, dual-reviewer screening against predefined inclusion criteria (sample size, geography, publication year), risk-of-bias assessment, and meta-analysis execution using SPSS or R. Statistical heterogeneity (I² values) will be evaluated, and sensitivity analyses performed to validate findings. Delierables include the full systematic review manuscript formatted to PRISMA guidelines, detailed extraction tables, forest plots, funnel plot analysis, and a Turnitin plagiarism report. Experience spans medical research, epidemiological studies, and health intervention trials—all requiring identical methodological rigor. Timeline and budget flexible. Work begins with protocol finalization and proceeds through screening phases with regular progress updates.

@EightVeer

Hi there, Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs assessing treatment efficacy, built around your sample-size, geography, and publication-year criteria, with screening, extraction, pooled statistical analysis, and a clear written synthesis. We will structure the evidence base carefully, apply the inclusion rules consistently, and present decision-ready interpretation of the findings. Our public Freelancer review history reflects AI adoption, data management, and analytical engagements. This first workstream is limited to data review, quantitative analysis and prioritised findings for Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. Broader implementation would be scoped separately on Freelancer. Best Regards, 8veer

@geologistt

Hi, I'd be glad to lead this systematic review and meta-analysis. My approach: PRISMA-compliant protocol with pre-registered inclusion/exclusion criteria (sample size, geography, publication year) to ensure transparency and reproducibility RCT-only screening using dual-reviewer selection to minimize bias Statistical synthesis via RevMan/R (metafor package) — pooled effect sizes, heterogeneity testing (I², Q-statistic), and subgroup/sensitivity analyses Risk of bias assessment using Cochrane RoB 2.0 I have hands-on experience running full-cycle reviews (search strategy → data extraction → forest plots → GRADE evidence rating) and consistently deliver on tight timelines without compromising rigor. I can share sample review protocols, forest plots, and a published/completed meta-analysis on request. Happy to hop on a quick call to align on your specific criteria and timeline.

@zubairbadar98

Hi, With over a decade of experience in academic writing and medical research, I am confident that I am the ideal candidate for your systematic review and meta-analysis project. My portfolio boasts a strong track record in conducting comprehensive literature reviews and summarizing complex data within specific criteria, much like what your project requires. I bring to the table not just technical expertise but also a profound understanding of the context and nuances that come with conducting research using randomized control trials. This deep-rooted understanding has helped me to successfully handle projects similar to yours that focus on assessing treatment efficacy. Moreover, my proficiency in statistical analysis ensures that I can effectively extract and analyze relevant data from different studies. My commitment to maintaining strict timelines and quality assurance will ensure the timely completion of this project without compromising on the thoroughness it demands. By choosing me, you'll be assured of a delivery that fully aligns with your needs, meeting all your inclusion criteria while adhering to high-quality standards. Thanks

@kaindo2017

Hello, I can support your systematic review and meta-analysis focused exclusively on randomized controlled trials. I hold a PhD in Strategic Management, with strong experience in research methodology, literature synthesis, critical appraisal, statistical interpretation, and academic manuscript preparation. I can assist with: • Developing and applying clear RCT-specific inclusion and exclusion criteria • Screening studies according to sample size, geographical location, and publication year • Extracting relevant study and outcome data systematically • Assessing methodological quality and risk of bias • Organising the review according to PRISMA principles • Conducting and interpreting appropriate meta-analytic analyses • Presenting pooled effects, heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses, and relevant subgroup analyses where appropriate • Preparing clear tables, figures, and a complete reference list • Critically interpreting the findings rather than simply reporting statistical results I understand that methodological consistency is critical when restricting the evidence base to eligible RCTs. I will carefully document study selection and ensure that every included study satisfies the agreed criteria. I’m available to begin immediately and can provide relevant research samples upon request.

@anumali0987

Hi, I have read the project description and can conduct a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis focused exclusively on randomized controlled trials assessing treatment efficacy. I can structure the review around your specified inclusion criteria, including sample size, geographical location, and publication year, while ensuring transparent study selection and reproducible methodology. I can handle literature screening, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, statistical pooling, heterogeneity analysis, sensitivity analysis where appropriate, and clear interpretation of the findings. I am also comfortable working with PRISMA-style reporting and can provide relevant examples of similar research work. Please message me. Thanks, Soha

@qualityxenter

Affordable, Early Delivery. ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★I hold a Masters degree which gives me the requisite background to handle writing from various subjects. I am a highly committed person towards my work. You can rely on QualityXenter for quality and consistency in writing. We never violate copyright rules. I have vast amount of experience in this industry since I am working from 2015 as a professional writer. I provide many modifications till to get your satisfactions. I have access to enough journals to use in your research project. I always produce quality work at VERY LOW RATES so, don't worry if you have a low budget for your work, I will be very happy to make a new client like you. I am producing quality work for my clients including ARTICLE WRITING, REPORT WRITING, ESSAY WRITING, RESEARCH PAPERS, BUSINESS PLAN, TECHNICAL WRITING, MATLAB, THESIS, ACCOUNTING & FINANCE work ETC. Go through my profile link https://www.freelancer.com/u/qualityxenter

@citijayamala

1. I am expert in writing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with focusing medical research, study screening, data extraction, and statistical interpretation. I can ensure including sample size, geographical location, and publication year and maintaining a rigorous and transparent review process. 2. I read your project description and I am sure that I can handle your project. 3. Also, an expert in Research writing, research reports, essays and advance essays, dissertations. 4. I will ensure that your project will be delivered on time with high standard. 5. Expert in all referencing styles (APA/ Harvard / IEEE /MLA/etc.). 6. 100 % Assurance on zero percent plagiarism. 7. TURNITIN / COPYSCAPE plagiarism report will be provided along with completed work 8. Assistance will be provided with the number of clarifications until client satisfaction 9. I will provide assistance even after the payment. And will maintain data (content) security. ● Free Turnitin plagiarism report ● Free Referencing ● I have more than 12 years of experience. ● This is my profile: https://www.freelancer.in/u/citijayamala Please connect in chat for more discussion, Regards, Jaya

@TheRSTeam

Hi, I am a data analyst/statistician and Economist with more than 6 years of experience. I can do your project, Please take time to check my profile and then you decide to contact me.

@SolutionMart

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses demand precise protocol adherence, rigorous RCT screening, and defensible statistical interpretation—areas where execution gaps typically undermine credibility. This project sits directly within my research methodology wheelhouse. The approach here requires: (1) structured database searches with documented inclusion/exclusion criteria against RCTs; (2) quality assessment using validated instruments; (3) heterogeneity evaluation and meta-analytic pooling using SPSS or comparable statistical software; (4) publication bias detection. Each phase demands methodological transparency for peer-review viability. Deliverables will include the full systematic review with PRISMA-compliant reporting, forest plots, sensitivity analyses, and a detailed statistical summary documenting effect sizes, confidence intervals, and I² values. All work includes source documentation and methodology justification. With 6+ years conducting research across medical, epidemiological, and statistical domains, combined with SPSS proficiency and extensive RCT literature navigation, the technical execution aligns with current standards. Timeline and specific scope can be finalized once research question parameters and database access details are confirmed.

@KolmanOuassou

Hi, I have been in the role for 6+ years and work as a data analyst, statistician and economist. I Have the ability to provide excellent work and the needs of your project. Would you be able to look at my profile and provide more information on previous projects and Reviews about my work as a contractor? Looking forward to your response. Best regards,

@Aaleen110

The biggest hurdle on jobs like this is consistently applying the inclusion criteria across all the research found, and also making sure the statistical models chosen actually fit the data without forcing it. I would approach this by first setting up a comprehensive search strategy using keywords derived directly from your brief and also from established databases like PubMed and Embase, I will then screen all titles and abstracts using Covidence to ensure each record is evaluated against your sample size, geographical location, and publication year requirements, those that pass this initial screening will then undergo full-text review also within Covidence by myself. For the statistical analysis I will use R with the metafor package for the meta-analysis, and I will choose a random-effects model as it better accounts for the expected heterogeneity between studies than a fixed-effect model, also the meta-analysis will include forest plots and funnel plots to assess publication bias. I would not use a software package that automates the data extraction without direct oversight as it often misses nuances in study design or reporting that are critical for accurate meta-analysis. Is the geographical location criterion a specific continent, region, or country level? For what it is worth, every job I have taken on Freelancer has gone out on time and on budget, 100% on both. Let's schedule a short call on Freelancer to go over the search strategy specifics and also the exact parameters for the inclusion criteria.

@kaimenyijohn5

Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis – RCTs, Treatment Efficacy, Inclusion Criteria (Sample Size, Geography, Publication Year) Hello, I'm John K. — MSc Economics & Statistician with 15+ years and 1,000+ projects (4.9⭐). I specialize in systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and medical research. You need a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing treatment efficacy through RCTs — include only randomized controlled trials, adhere to specific inclusion criteria (sample size, geographical location, publication year). How I'll approach it: Define research question and inclusion/exclusion criteria Search databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) for RCTs Screen studies against criteria (sample size, location, year) Extract data and assess risk of bias Perform meta-analysis with appropriate statistical models Generate forest plots, funnel plots, and publication bias tests Interpret results and prepare comprehensive report What you'll receive: ✅ Systematic review protocol ✅ Data extraction tables ✅ Meta-analysis results with forest/funnel plots ✅ Comprehensive report Timeline: 3-4 weeks depending on study volume. Samples of previous systematic review work available upon request. I'm ready to start as soon as you share your research question and specific criteria. Drop a message. Looking forward, John K.

@sajjadtaghvaeifr

Hello, I trust you're doing well. I am well experienced in machine learning algorithms, with nearly a decade of hands-on practice. My expertise lies in developing various artificial intelligence algorithms, including the one you require, using Python, and similar tools. I have worked with pytorch, and tensorflow to develop DL models, .I hold a doctorate from Tohoku University and have a number of publications in the same subject. My portfolio, which showcases my past work, is available for your review. Your project piqued my interest, and I would be delighted to be part of it. Let's connect to discuss in detail. Warm regards. please check my portfolio link: https://www.freelancer.com/u/sajjadtaghvaeifr

@soniayousuf

Your project needs a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment efficacy using only randomized controlled trials, with studies filtered by sample size, geographic location, and publication year. The final output should clearly match your inclusion criteria and support a reliable evidence summary for decision-making. I will screen studies against the brief, extract the RCT data, and synthesize the findings with careful attention to study quality, consistency, and reporting. The work will be structured, original, and properly referenced, with a clean final document and any summary tables or study selection details required. If you have a preferred reporting style or reference format, I can follow it exactly. Best, Sonia

@goprosol

Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis Expert needed to assess treatment efficacy through RCTs. As a PhD Scholar and Lecturer with extensive experience in research and analysis, I understand the importance of adhering to specific inclusion criteria and conducting thorough systematic reviews. With expertise in medical research and statistical analysis, I am well-equipped to handle the complexities of this project. By focusing on sample size, geographical location, and publication year, I will ensure the highest level of accuracy and reliability in the results. I will approach this project with meticulous attention to detail, meeting all deadlines and delivering a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. My work will be structured, original, and aligned with the client's requirements, providing valuable insights into treatment efficacy through RCTs. Javvad Yousuf PhD Scholar | Lecturer | Research • Strategy • Analysis

@ImranAli01

Hi there, I got that you need a systematic review and meta-analysis focused specifically on treatment efficacy using randomized controlled trials, with strict screening based on sample size, geographical location, and publication year. This is what I can help you with, let's chat. My approach is to define and apply the eligibility criteria consistently, conduct a structured database search, screen and extract the relevant RCT data, assess study quality/risk of bias, and organize the dataset for statistical analysis. I’ll perform the meta-analysis using appropriate effect measures, heterogeneity assessment, subgroup/sensitivity analysis where applicable, and clearly interpret the findings while maintaining a reproducible research workflow. As final deliverables you will receive the screened RCT dataset, data extraction table, eligibility/screening record, risk-of-bias assessment, statistical analysis, meta-analysis results/figures, and a structured report documenting the methodology and findings. Should the meta-analysis follow a specific reporting framework such as PRISMA, and do you already have a target medical condition or treatment defined? I’d be happy to review the research question and inclusion criteria before starting. Regards, Imran A.

@CauaAlves

I can conduct a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess treatment efficacy. I have experience with PRISMA guidelines, statistical meta-analysis methods, and academic research methodology. Here is my proposed workflow: Phase 1 — Protocol & search strategy: Define PICO framework, develop comprehensive search queries across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, and register inclusion/exclusion criteria. Phase 2 — Screening & data extraction: Screen titles/abstracts using structured criteria (sample size, geography, publication year), then extract outcome data into standardized forms for analysis. Phase 3 — Statistical analysis: Compute pooled effect sizes using fixed/random-effects models, run heterogeneity tests (I-squared, Q-statistic), perform subgroup and sensitivity analyses. I use Python (scipy, statsmodels) and R (metafor, meta) for reproducible computation. Phase 4 — Reporting: Produce a PRISMA-compliant report with forest plots, funnel plots, bias assessment, and full reference list. Before I begin, could you clarify the specific treatment or clinical intervention and patient population the review should focus on? That will help me tailor the search strategy from day one.

@Saimkhurana100

Hello, I can support this systematic review and meta-analysis project with a structured, data-focused approach, particularly around study screening, data organization, extraction and statistical analysis. I understand the requirement to include only eligible randomized controlled trials and apply clearly defined criteria for sample size, geographical location and publication year. I can assist with: • Organizing and screening study records according to the provided criteria • Extracting relevant study and outcome data into a structured dataset • Checking data consistency and identifying missing or conflicting information • Preparing analysis-ready datasets • Supporting statistical analysis and interpretation of quantitative results • Creating clear tables, summaries and visualizations • Maintaining a transparent record of inclusion/exclusion decisions I would follow the supplied research protocol and inclusion criteria carefully and ensure that analysis assumptions and data-processing steps are clearly documented. I can work with Excel/CSV datasets and statistical tools as required and provide organized outputs suitable for the research workflow. I would be happy to review the protocol and inclusion criteria before starting so the scope, methodology and deliverables are clearly defined. Best regards, Shaikh Saim